FOLLOW THE MONEY

The funding sources, interests, and financial stakes involved can shape the direction of conservation efforts, sometimes overshadowing other considerations. It is essential to acknowledge and address the role of big money in these matters to ensure that decisions are made in the best interest of the ecosystem, the deer and the community.

In our world today, the influence of big money in pivotal decisions like the proposed eradication of the deer on Catalina Island is a significant factor that cannot be overlooked.

The focus of the Catalina Island Conservancy’s current "Restoration" plan and interviews with the Press, appears to be on utilizing emotionally charged PR terms like "tipping point" to draw attention. However, a closer scrutiny reveals an underlying emphasis on enhancing public engagement with the land, such as jeep tours, equestrian shows, wedding chapel, vineyard, hiking, camping and future development. This shift towards increased human activity on the island raises concerns regarding its direct ecological impact, which has not been adequately addressed within the plan. Furthermore, there seems to be a potential for direct fiscal benefits to both the Conservancy and the Catalina Island Company as a result of heightened public use.

Photo: Laurel Sanchez

It is important to consider various perspectives when discussing the financial implications of managing the deer population on Catalina Island. While some may argue that options such as removing or managing the deer are unfeasible due to the financial strain on the Conservancy, it is worth noting that the budget allocated for eradicating 100% of the deer on the island is reportedly million of dollars.

Additionally, there are significant financial resources being directed towards retaining a high-powered Public Relations firm to “manage public perception”. These expenditures raise questions about the allocation of funds and priorities within the Conservancy.